- #Reddit firefox vs chrome addons install
- #Reddit firefox vs chrome addons plus
- #Reddit firefox vs chrome addons download
#Reddit firefox vs chrome addons install
While you can - and should - install extensions to go around the issue, Firefox beats Chrome in terms of tab management.
This continues up to a point where you cannot identify the sites anymore that you have opened, as they all show up as blank tabs without visual identification. This means that tabs will be reduced in size the more websites you open in the browser at the same time.
#Reddit firefox vs chrome addons plus
What we do know is that Mozilla has a very high standard when it comes to privacy, as outlined on the company website.įirefox is also purely open source, while Google Chrome is based on the open source Chromium project plus additions that Google makes to it (that are not necessarily open source).īoth browsers support tabbed browsing, but Google Chrome does not support tabbar scrolling.
It is not clear how Google uses telemetry data that it gathers from Chrome. Google is an advertising company, as it makes the bulk of its revenue from its ads business. Plus, the Chrome Web Store is a nightmare to navigate. All Chrome extensions do not require a restart of the browser upon installation for example, while only Jetpack Firefox extensions don't as well. I'm no extension developer and could not really find a detailed comparison of what both extension APIs support and what they do not support.įirefox is not superior in all regards though.
#Reddit firefox vs chrome addons download
There is no good download manager that comes close to DownThemAll for example, and unique extensions such as Automatic Save Folder that allows you to save to different folders based on file names or domains, or Tree Style Tab which changes how tabs are displayed in Firefox. While you will find many popular extensions for both browsers, Firefox extensions can for instance manipulate the browser chrome, while Chrome extensions cannot do so except for adding an icon to the address bar.Ĭhrome is still lacking when it comes to some extension types. While that may improve stability and security, it still means that more memory is used by the browser.Įxtensions can do more in Firefox than they can in Chrome. This can be attributed - at least partially - to how Chrome handles websites, as the browser opens them in individual processes. We have compared the memory usage of Chrome, Internet Explorer, Firefox and Opera in the past and came to the conclusion that Chrome used more memory than all other browsers. While things have changed dramatically in the past two years, many users still think that Firefox is less memory efficient as Google Chrome. This was not only caused by the browser itself, but also by extensions that you ran in it. New icon designs, additional icons, new toolbars, a different layout, or even classic themes that restore how Firefox looked a couple of years ago.įor a long time, Firefox was the browser that seemed to have an insatiable hunger for RAM. In Firefox, and I'm talking about complete themes here, you get total conversions. In Chrome, you get different color schemes and a different background image, that is it. Some examples? Extension that modify the font size of the interface, the width of tabs in the browser, or add favicons back to the address bar of the browser.
0 kommentar(er)
